Afghanistan Vet Running for Office Smeared for His Service

by: Brandon Friedman

Wed May 14, 2008 at 11:19:55 AM EDT


Afghanistan veteran and Kansas City attorney Jason Kander is our newest Emerging Leader at VoteVets.org.  He's currently a State House candidate for Missouri's 44th District.  

Unfortunately, Jason is facing a problem: He's currently being attacked publicly for his service in Afghanistan by those who--for whatever reason--have an interest in seeing him defeated later this year.  And frankly, it's disgusting.  It seems that there's a bit of a whisper campaign going on in Kansas City to discredit Jason's honorable service--and it's not just coming from those on the Right.  In fact, a good number of the smears appear to be coming from fellow Democrats, because Jason is currently in a tough primary battle.

Most of the anonymous comments are emanating from the message boards of a single website, though it is apparent to Kander's supporters that these rumors are being spread systematically throughout the district to reinforce the comments you'll read below.  The rumors, like the swift boat-style comments, are created anonymously.  I spoke with the Kander campaign and they refused to place responsibility on their opponents personally, but they do believe it to be a group of their opponents' most avid supporters.  Many of these commenters call him a "phony soldier" or imply that he's some sort of war criminal because he is a Military Intelligence officer.  

However, as the Vice Chairman of America's largest political organization of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, I can attest that Jason is neither a phony soldier nor a war criminal.  Rather, he's an up and coming Army officer and public servant who has done nothing to invite these attacks on his character.  Either way, here is a sampling of the anonymous slander Jason is facing.  The comments below come from two separate blog posts on a single, prominent Kansas City political blog called Gone Mild.

From the post, Play Ball!! Quarterly Campaign Finance Reports Time! on April 15, 2008:

"You wrapped Jason in the flag when you introduced him on your blog, even though we have no idea whether he spent his time incarcerating people without trial. He has never even made the unit he served in public, which makes me wonder whether that unit might show up in some reports on collateral damage or the like. You just heap praise on the little patriot without asking."

That's funny, because Jason served with Combined Forces Command - Afghanistan, a unit that received the Joint Meritorious Unit Award, the second highest unit distinction that the military bestows.  More:

"A real soldier would still be overseas fighting. Ms. Butter Bar went to Afghanistan as a way to further his political career. Enough said."

Like I said, nauseating.  This is what Kander--a veteran of Afghanistan who's decided to continue his public service--is facing.  But it gets worse:

From the post, Candidates, Slander, and the 44th on April 17, 2008:

"Is Jason still in the military? If so, isn't there a good chance that he will be called back up for duty?

"I guess it is conceivable that he could miss the 2009 and 2010 legislative sessions because he is in Iraq or Afghanistan. Is this right?"
::
"So did Kander resign his commission to run for office, or will he be redeployed? If he is still in the military, isn't it highly likely he will miss one or more legislative sessions in his first term (if he wins)?"

"Highly likely" that he'll be unable to represent his constituents.   I love the wording there--even though it has no basis in fact.  This is classic concern trolling.  The commenters are deliberately using Jason's military service to cast doubt on his ability to carry out his duties in the district.  And here's another full frontal attack by a keyboard commando hiding behind his computer at home:

"My guess is that this guy is faking his war record. He sat back at the camp and drank beer while poor guys went out into harm's way. I lost jobs to people like that over the years."

Classy.

" I've heard him describe his service as being a Military Intelligence Officer. 'Finding the bad guys.'  'He questioned people', correct?  Did he interrogate them?  Did he recommend that people undergo interrogation techniques? . . . Did Jason make judgments and recommendations that resulted in Afghanis, and others, being interrogated?  Well, if his job was to 'find the bad guys' then he probably did recommend interrogation or do some of that himself, correct?  What were the interrogation techniques he and others downstream used? . . . Did Jason's actions results in Afghanis and other being waterboarded?  Did he recommend people to be detained?  Were these people in turn sent to other countries to be interrogated? . . . We know for a fact that human rights abuses have been perpetrated on Afghanis and Iraqis for the sake of U.S. National Security.  Was Jason a part of that machine?

With absolutely no evidence, that reader is trying to plant the seed that Jason is responsible for waterboarding Afghans.

"Do the people of the 44th have any idea what the "psyop special operations" teams do in Afghanistan?  Mr. Kander should provide documentation as to what he did and did not do . . .This is the area where people were grabbed and held without trial and some were deported against international law. It is the special ops teams that turned people over to contract CIA personnel for torture.

I am damn well sure that young Mr. Kander has some explaining to do. If he was associated with any of the wrong doing by "company" contractors he should not even practice law let alone write law."

Disgusting.  The Catch-22 they're setting up is to declare Jason guilty until proven innocent, knowing full well that his work and the documentation that supported it are classified.  As if there were any doubt, Jason has a full description of his job in Afghanistan and excerpts from his performance evaluation available on his website.  

These comments that I've excerpted are only the tip of the iceberg.  There are a slew of others, but I don't want to go overboard in giving them the satisfaction of reprinting their handiwork here.

As you can see, these swift boat style attacks have no place in civil political discourse.  This guy volunteered for dangerous duty, upheld the highest legal and ethical standards, and he's being baselessly attacked for it.

To learn more about Jason Kander, or to help his campaign, please visit his website:

Kander for State Representative

We need to help push Jason over the top.

Brandon Friedman :: Afghanistan Vet Running for Office Smeared for His Service
Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Jeez (4.00 / 1)
what the hell is wrong with these jerkoffs? I think it is high time that all self important political types such as the ones responsible for such comments realize that they should not be attacking any US serviceman's record, seeing that they along with the chickenhawks did an utterly piss poor job of holding down the fort while some of us were doing what able bodied men are supposed to do in a time of war, serve their country. Do you have the address for the site responsible for these comments? I think I will go over there and shoot them a piece of my mind.

Yeah, click on the links (0.00 / 0)
in the piece, or just go here.  But remember, the site isn't responsible for the comments. . .the commenters are.  It's just like here.

[ Parent ]
Brandon, (0.00 / 0)
am I getting this right? Amy Coffman is one of three candidates along with Jason, and she's a Democrat, right? So these attacks are coming from a Coffman supporter, is that right?

I'm not sure where the attacks (0.00 / 0)
are coming from, but they do seem to be emanating from the camps of his primary opponents--who are certainly Democrats.

[ Parent ]
So, Coffman is a Democrat. (0.00 / 0)
And the other opponent is also a Democrat?

If we suspect that these attacks are coming from the other Democrats' camps, even though the candidates themselves may not have anything to do with it, it still is going to reflect on them. They may not want that and may be willing to write a statement denouncing the attacks. How about writing a letter asking them to do so and circulate it starting here for signatures? Couldn't that help?  


[ Parent ]
Oh, I see, this is the primary. (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
I warned all of you... (0.00 / 0)
...about those crazy Democrats =)

[ Parent ]
You did. (0.00 / 0)
Honestly, I don't even recognize my party anymore. I don't even recognize my country. But, I can guarantee, in my immediate sphere small as it is, I don't know anyone left, right or in between who would approve of the sort of crap I read on that website. Don't know what's to be done about it though. Makes me angry, makes me sad, and it's the kind of shit that's making me old and tired.

I still think a military coup is a good idea.


[ Parent ]
Gotta love... (4.00 / 1)
...the open sewer that is the internet.  Here's to you Mr. Anonymous Keyboard Commando, because of you we question our very humanity.

Sad isn't it? (0.00 / 0)
They make these despicable remarks in the name of America and all that is good, but instead end up coming off as self-serving, foul-mouthed assholes.  I wonder if any of them have given up golf.  Or anything for that matter.

[ Parent ]
Irony? (4.00 / 1)

Am I the only one who sees the irony in your statement?

 


[ Parent ]
But my keyboard commando tactics... (4.00 / 1)
...are cheeky, these are just tragic.

[ Parent ]
Fair enough. (0.00 / 0)

I got nothing but <3 for ya.

[ Parent ]
Wow. (0.00 / 0)
Thanks for bringing this to light. I love how transparent it is that they are doing to him exactly what they are accusing him of having done in Afghanistan- running a perverse I/O campaign.  

WE SHOULD GO ON THE OFFENSE (4.00 / 1)
Brandon,

How about we send a letter to the editors of the primary print and electronic media challenging them to report on the Swift Boating.  We could also send a letter to the editors for publication and/or offer ourselves to speak on morning and evening radio shows.  

If we hit this hard it could backfire on the people doing it and end up helping our candidates.  If we have a standard response that is effective it will give people second thoughts about doing this sort of thing.  

Semper Fi


VetVoice on Social Media
Follow rockrichard on Twitter

VoteVets.org on Facebook
  • VetVoice Recommends

    "The War I Always Wanted,"
    By Brandon Friedman

    "The welcome mat for memoirs by veterans of operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom might never wear out so long as they write with the savvy of Brandon Friedman . . . Friedman's take is vivid, frank, precise and dramatic." --Military Times

    "Add Brandon Friedman's The War I Always Wanted to the ranks of outstanding non-fiction produced by officers from elite combat units in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Always truthful, often excruciatingly so, The War I Always Wanted rises at numerous points to the level of literature." --Steven Pressfield, author of Gates of Fire

    Buy The War I Always Wanted here.

    "A Time To Lead,"
    By General (Ret.) Wesley K. Clark

    "A Time To Lead confirms the rewarding benefits of military service at a time when such service is experiencing considerable strain. It also includes a comprehensive description of America's current national imperatives, which deserve serious consideration." --General Alexander M. Haig, Jr., former Secretary of State

    "This is a primer on leadership forged in battle and by decades of experience. . .This isn't just a book; it's a manual for leading people and living a good life." --Barry McCaffrey, General, USA (ret.)

    Buy A Time to Lead here.

    "Love My Rifle More Than You,"
    By Kayla Williams

    "Whip smart, sassy, with a mouth as foul as a sailor's, 28-year-old Sergeant Kayla Williams. . .tells what it's like to be a female soldier in Iraq." --Booklist

    ". . .echoes military memoirists from Julius Caesar to Ernie Pyle." --Publishers Weekly

    ". . .a shocking, on-the-ground view of one military woman's experience in Iraq." --Bookmarks Magazine

    Buy Love My Rifle More Than You here.

    "How to Break a Terrorist,"
    By Matthew Alexander

    "...a riveting, fast-paced account that reads like a first-rate thriller." --Publisher's Weekly

    " ...an absorbing behind-the-scenes look at the secret intelligence war within a war." --Military.com

    Buy How to Break a Terrorist here.

    Search

    Advanced Search

    RSS Feed Links

    Subscribe to VetVoice in a feed reader!

    Subscribe to VetVoice by Email!

    Diaries and comments at VetVoice do not necessarily represent the views of VoteVets.org. VetVoice will strive to remove any illegal material as soon as it is flagged. Similarly, VetVoice will use its discretion in determining whether to remove exceedingly offensive material. However, between posting and removal, any offensive or illegal material does not reflect the condoning or endorsing of said material by VoteVets.org or VetVoice.
    Similarly, the views expressed on this website are those of the authors alone. Opinions on this website do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Defense or any of its components.
    Menu

    Front Page Writers
    PTSD Resources
    TBI Resources
    IRR Information
    Casualty Reports
    VA Information
    Support the Troops
    Veteran Candidates We Support
    Congressional Committees
    Contact Your Elected Leaders
    Sites We Like

    Paid for VoteVets Political Action Committee. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. VoteVets Action Fund is a 501(c)(4) organization which primarily focuses on nonpartisan education and advocacy on behalf veterans and their families. VoteVets Political Action Committee is a federal political committee which primarily helps elect Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran candidates and educates about veterans and military issues aimed at influencing the outcome of the next election.

    Site Design: Articulated Man

    VoteVets Political Action and Vote Vets Action Fund are separate organizations.

    Powered by: SoapBlox