McCain Credits Surge for Anbar Awakening

by: Brandon Friedman

Wed Jul 23, 2008 at 00:34:24 AM EDT


John McCain went on CBS News on Tuesday and told Katie Couric that the "surge" in Baghdad was responsible for the Anbar Awakening.  Unfortunately for Senator McCain, the Anbar Awakening began in 2006; the surge in 2007.  It's unclear at this point whether McCain was lying or just utterly clueless with regard to events on the ground in Iraq.

Either way, Spencer Ackerman and Ilan Goldenberg are doing damage.

Here's Goldenberg:

John McCain made a mistake this evening, which as far as I'm concerned disqualifies him from being President.  It is so appalling and so factually wrong that I'm actually sitting here wondering who McCain's advisers are.  This isn't some gaffe where he talks about the Iraq-Pakistan border.  It's a real misunderstanding of what has happened in Iraq over the past year.  It is even more disturbing because according to John McCain, Iraq is the central front in the "war on terror."  If we are going to have an Iraq-centric policy, he should at least understand what he is talking about.

And here's what McCain actually said:

COURIC: Senator McCain, Senator Obama says, while the increased number of US troops contributed to increased security in Iraq, he also credits the Sunni awakening and the Shiite government going after militias. And says that there might have been improved security even without the surge. What's your response to that?

MCCAIN: I don't know how you respond to something that is as-- such a false depiction of what actually happened. Colonel McFarlane [phonetic] was contacted by one of the major Sunni sheiks. Because of the surge we were able to go out and protect that sheik and others. And it began the Anbar awakening. I mean, that's just a matter of history. Thanks to General Petraeus, our leadership, and the sacrifice of brave young Americans. I mean, to deny that their sacrifice didn't make possible the success of the surge in Iraq, I think, does a great disservice to young men and women who are serving and have sacrificed.

They were out there. They were protecting these sheiks. We had the Anbar awakening. We now have a government that's effective. We have a legal system that's working, although poorly. And we have progress on all fronts. Including-- an incredible measure of security for the people of Iraq. There will still be attacks. Al Qaeda's not defeated. But the progress has been immense. And to not recognize that, and why it happened, and how it happened, I think is-- is really quite a commentary.

Weird and terrifying all at the same time.

Brandon Friedman :: McCain Credits Surge for Anbar Awakening
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I dont (0.00 / 0)
think the Tribal Councils had anything to do with the surge at all. Rather, it probably had to do with the fact that AQI and their Wahhabi brothers are serious assholes whom pretty much everyone who has actually dealt with them wishes an immediate death. The brave and sensible actions of our troops in Anbar certainly had alot to do with the turnaround, but the politicians made little,if any contribution. I just the partisan political idiots dont go and do something boneheaded again, like supporting Muslim Brotherhood linked groups like the IIP over the Tribal Councils.

Not A Mistake (4.00 / 1)
If you listen closely or read the writings of those spinning the talking points the 'surge', i.e. escalation and still in effect, everything they imagine is due to the great leaders victory surge, and that includes the cooperation.

Security is tighter, but it seems nothing else, exactly what the surge was supposed to accomplish, has been.

They totally ignore, and change the subject or go quiet, when one brings up Sadr's ceasefires, the refugee problem, the ethnic cleansing of the neighborhoods, the blast walls surrounding some of those neighborhoods, the paying of these groups to cooperate which has been reported that program is coming to an end.........................

The government is still only moving at a snails pace if at all, the infrastructure, electricity, sewage, garbage doesn't seem to have improved, and the rebuilding looks about as stagnant as it has.

Yet when pushed that if their surge worked so well than troops not needed anymore in Iraq they start spinning the total opposite, troops stay, more might be needed, they still aren't looking at Afghanistan nor worried about it..............................................., yet they aren't rushing to their recruiters.

Not a mistake, say it over and over, and people believe it, the rush mantra and rovian speak.

And the Press helps out because most of them don't understand nor care neither!

I'm still waiting for a definition of 'Victory', though we've been waiting for that definition since 'Nam, and McCain's a pilot, not a chopper pilot and not a grunt!

'Hearts and Minds, "The ultimate victory will depend on the hearts and minds of the people who actually live there." -- President Lyndon Johnson


Falluja (0.00 / 0)
Fallujah braces for another assault

In the face of US military claims of improved security, violence has been rising by the day this month. The city has now been placed under tight curfew while US and Iraqi military forces prepare for a new offensive, according to the local Azzaman daily.
Iraqi security forces have established new checkpoints around the city and are forbidding movement of people and traffic. Pick-up trucks are roaming the city warning residents that al-Qaeda has once again infiltrated Fallujah.


'Hearts and Minds, "The ultimate victory will depend on the hearts and minds of the people who actually live there." -- President Lyndon Johnson

[ Parent ]
I doubt there (4.00 / 1)
will be another assault on Fallujah. Probably a disinformation campaign put forth by the IIP and their partners in crime, AQI. Then again, why dont we get out of the way and let the tribesman go at AQI however they see fit. It would be Iraqis standing up so we can stand down, wouldn't it?

[ Parent ]
If the surge was a success (4.00 / 2)
Then we can bring our troops home.  If it accomplished the goals it was intended to accomplish, then we no longer need to have a massive military presence there.  To say that we can not withdraw our troops is to say that the surge was a failure.  McCain cannot have it both ways.  You cannot say that the surge was a success, and we need to stay.  Victory means exit strategy, and it is important for [whoever the next president is going to be] to tell us what that strategy is.  

"No U.S. soldier ever dies in vain because they're carrying out the missions of their commander in chief. And we honor all the service that they've provided." - Barack Obama

I Keep (0.00 / 0)
Saying that to posters, on the few political boards like google groups, I sometimes visit or send posts, when playing with the bush bots.

They than start debating themselves in their replys and any posts they add, taking Both Sides, the writers from the right, the talking heads of the right, and the McCains.

'Hearts and Minds, "The ultimate victory will depend on the hearts and minds of the people who actually live there." -- President Lyndon Johnson


[ Parent ]
They (0.00 / 0)
Also do the 'rove', change the purpose of the 'surge' as it was defined when developed, that's where and what McCain is doing.

'Hearts and Minds, "The ultimate victory will depend on the hearts and minds of the people who actually live there." -- President Lyndon Johnson

[ Parent ]
2008 Election: a referendum on the 07 troop surge (4.00 / 1)
On the foreign policy front; the republicans are trying to turn the election into a referendum on the 2007 troop surge. As if that one supposed success ought to overshadow the multitude of errors and blunders which have defined this conflict.

Given that Barack Obama opposed the war from its outset, it would have been illlogical for him to support an escalation four years in. And that is the criticism of the right. Consistent with that logic; someone fundamentally opposed to abortion, ought to favor government financed free clinics. Not logical.

Additionally, and to the best of my knowledge, the Senate was not required to vote on a "troop surge." Any more than they were expect to favor appropriate body armor, or stop loss, or multiple deployments per se. And McCain was not the combatant commander on the ground....despite what he may want the American people to think. There were multiple troop surges in 2006 (Operation Together Forward I, II), all of which failed. Did he support them?

We cannot allow the war to be quarterbacked from the middle of the game, lest we lose sight of the rational behind our starting the war, and what U.S. interest are.

Brandon E. Woods
OIF 05-07



[ Parent ]
CNN. (0.00 / 0)

I said that during the CNN roundtable that aired yesterday.

[ Parent ]
VetVoice on Social Media
Follow rockrichard on Twitter

VoteVets.org on Facebook
  • VetVoice Recommends

    "The War I Always Wanted,"
    By Brandon Friedman

    "The welcome mat for memoirs by veterans of operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom might never wear out so long as they write with the savvy of Brandon Friedman . . . Friedman's take is vivid, frank, precise and dramatic." --Military Times

    "Add Brandon Friedman's The War I Always Wanted to the ranks of outstanding non-fiction produced by officers from elite combat units in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Always truthful, often excruciatingly so, The War I Always Wanted rises at numerous points to the level of literature." --Steven Pressfield, author of Gates of Fire

    Buy The War I Always Wanted here.

    "A Time To Lead,"
    By General (Ret.) Wesley K. Clark

    "A Time To Lead confirms the rewarding benefits of military service at a time when such service is experiencing considerable strain. It also includes a comprehensive description of America's current national imperatives, which deserve serious consideration." --General Alexander M. Haig, Jr., former Secretary of State

    "This is a primer on leadership forged in battle and by decades of experience. . .This isn't just a book; it's a manual for leading people and living a good life." --Barry McCaffrey, General, USA (ret.)

    Buy A Time to Lead here.

    "Love My Rifle More Than You,"
    By Kayla Williams

    "Whip smart, sassy, with a mouth as foul as a sailor's, 28-year-old Sergeant Kayla Williams. . .tells what it's like to be a female soldier in Iraq." --Booklist

    ". . .echoes military memoirists from Julius Caesar to Ernie Pyle." --Publishers Weekly

    ". . .a shocking, on-the-ground view of one military woman's experience in Iraq." --Bookmarks Magazine

    Buy Love My Rifle More Than You here.

    "How to Break a Terrorist,"
    By Matthew Alexander

    "...a riveting, fast-paced account that reads like a first-rate thriller." --Publisher's Weekly

    " ...an absorbing behind-the-scenes look at the secret intelligence war within a war." --Military.com

    Buy How to Break a Terrorist here.

    Search

    Advanced Search

    RSS Feed Links

    Subscribe to VetVoice in a feed reader!

    Subscribe to VetVoice by Email!

    Diaries and comments at VetVoice do not necessarily represent the views of VoteVets.org. VetVoice will strive to remove any illegal material as soon as it is flagged. Similarly, VetVoice will use its discretion in determining whether to remove exceedingly offensive material. However, between posting and removal, any offensive or illegal material does not reflect the condoning or endorsing of said material by VoteVets.org or VetVoice.
    Similarly, the views expressed on this website are those of the authors alone. Opinions on this website do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Defense or any of its components.
    Menu

    Front Page Writers
    PTSD Resources
    TBI Resources
    IRR Information
    Casualty Reports
    VA Information
    Support the Troops
    Veteran Candidates We Support
    Congressional Committees
    Contact Your Elected Leaders
    Sites We Like

    Paid for VoteVets Political Action Committee. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. VoteVets Action Fund is a 501(c)(4) organization which primarily focuses on nonpartisan education and advocacy on behalf veterans and their families. VoteVets Political Action Committee is a federal political committee which primarily helps elect Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran candidates and educates about veterans and military issues aimed at influencing the outcome of the next election.

    Site Design: Articulated Man

    VoteVets Political Action and Vote Vets Action Fund are separate organizations.

    Powered by: SoapBlox