Awakening Groups Want More Money...Or Else

by: Chris LeJeune

Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 12:07:00 PM EDT


Who can honestly say they didn't see this coming?  We start paying insurgents to fight for us instead of against us, and their loyalty sides with the money.  We all know that Al-Qaeda is very well financed due to Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, and these guys seem willing to follow the money.

The Iraqi officer leading a U.S.-financed anti-jihadist group is in no mood for small talk -- either the military gives him more money or he will pack his bags and rejoin the ranks of al-Qaeda.

"I'll go back to al-Qaeda if you stop backing the Sahwa (Awakening) groups," Col. Satar tells U.S. Lt. Matthew McKernon, as he tries to secure more funding for his men to help battle the anti-U.S. insurgents.

What do you call someone who fights for money?  Mercenary.  And in this case, the mercenaries started out on the other side of the battlefield.

Most members of the Awakening groups are Sunni Arab former insurgents who themselves fought American troops under the al-Qaeda banner after the fall of the regime of executed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.

Some, like Satar, had served in Saddam's army before joining Al-Qaeda. Others were members of criminal gangs before deciding to fight the insurgents, with the backing of the U.S. military.

This poses quite a problem for the US military, and for the US government, as well as for the Iraqis.  Many military leaders and Iraqi civilians have credited the Awakening groups with the huge drop in violence.  The logic is rather simple, really.  If you pay your enemy to stop attacking you, violence will go down.  But now they want more.

They earn around 300 dollars a month and their presence at checkpoints and on patrol has become an essential component of the U.S.-led coalition's strategy to restore order in the war-wracked country.

"I like my work," said Satar, who is in charge of security south of Baquba in Iraq's eastern Diyala province.

According to McKernon Satar has a contract with the U.S. military to employ 230 men "but he has more than 300" under his command, which is why he wants more money to keep them happy.

The U.S. military knows perfectly well that many people joined Awakening groups simply because it was a good way to make money, and that if the cashflow dries up some would not hesitate to return to al-Qaeda.

In a bid to avoid this, the U.S.-led coalition is helping Awakening members to return to a "normal life," according to US Admiral Patrick Driscoll.

He told AFP that options included helping them return to the lives they had before joining the insurgency or joining the Iraqi security forces.

Some 17,000 Awakening members have opted for the second choice, and 2,500 of them now hold administrative positions, Driscoll said.

The pay is rather good considering that in 2004, most Iraqi police were only getting 60 dollars a month.  This is very confusing to Iraqi families.  When I was in Iraq, there was much animosity towards the Sunnis.  Although they are the minority, they had held great power over the Shia under Saddam.  Now the government of Iraq is predominately Shia, and most of the military and police are drawn from the Iranian Badr Organization.  The Sunni Awakening groups are a delicate balance.

Chris LeJeune :: Awakening Groups Want More Money...Or Else
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Ironic, isn't it? (4.00 / 1)
The Associataed Press just told us we've won the war. We can't leave, but we won.

Now we're seeing why--it's a shakedown.


I thought the surge worked? (4.00 / 1)
What happened?

Imagine that... (4.00 / 1)
Should this be a surprise to anyone?  

Sure, the surge worked...

http://www.ivaw.org


I hate to say "I told you so." (4.00 / 1)
But...yeah.

This is what the real "surge" was about (4.00 / 1)

The paying off of the Sunni Awakening groups along with, I bet, many other ethnic groups  is what the real "surge" was about.  The use of some 30,000-40,000 additional U.S. troops placed in and around Baghdad was just a way to cover that up.  I mean, lets face it, those additional troops, no matter where they were placed,  really wouldn't have made much of a difference given the situation.  There was outside influences, rampant anti-Americanism along with multiple sectarian conflicts that were being waged in many Iraqi cities at the time.  To think that an additional, small number of U.S. troops added to the troops already in Iraq some how quelled all of that and in such a short period of time is just unrealistic.  The U.S. military is good, but not that good.  Something else had to happen behind the scenes to get those various groups along with their Iraqi military allies who belong to various sects to cooperate and now we see what that something was.  

Now, the Sunni Awakening Groups are asking for more.  They know they can control how Iraq appears to the American public and they know how desperate the Bush Administration is so they are going to make much larger demands from the United States as a price for their continued cooperation.  The Bush Administration has set the United States up to be extorted and/or blackmailed.  It is only a matter of time before someone like the Shia leader Al Sadr makes similar demands.

"Armed forces abroad are of little value unless there is prudent counsel at home."

Marcus Tullius Cicero 106 BC-43 BC


Pay them. (4.00 / 1)
Isn't this endemic of the huge f/u Bolton created with "de-Baathification"? So, in essence, we took them off the payroll, let them kill a bunch of American GI's and Iraqi civilians, then put them back on the payroll, right?

I say keep paying them. Stop paying huge contracts to the likes of KBR and Blackwater and keep paying these rascals right on up to the day we leave, (which should start today!)


Protection Money or "Payola" (4.00 / 3)
Before the payment business began, a minority viewpoint was offered at CENTCOM in which comparisons were made to the "protection money" racket in the United States.

Unfortunately this was a minority viewpoint as not many Officers/NCOs grew up in an environment where there was "community policing" that was funded with protection money. This was a topic of stories not something that most people had experienced at some point in their lives.

Iraq became one giant neighborhood that became subject to protection money.

What happens when the local business refuses to increase the funding (tribute) that is requested for "community policing?"

The "protection" stops and all manners of "crime" appear.

We are not dealing with the real Al Qaeda in Iraq, we are instead dealing with organized crime in Iraq. Not the best organized crime but it highly resembles the crime families of the United States.

Until you know who/what your enemy is, you have no chance of defeating it.  


I've been screaming about this forever... (4.00 / 2)
Why isn't this "out" there in the MSM press? Congress..everyone must know this, so why don't the pols ever mention it! Joe Biden is the only one I can think of who actually brought it up on MTP or something a couple months back!  I've been calling it the "splurge"..and without it, the "surge" wouldn't have had a snowball's chance in hell!  

"Splurge" BRAVO, I will shamelessly use that!!! (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
I have been wondering this about a lot of things (0.00 / 0)
Why doesn't the press report on the tight relationship between Iraq and Iran?  Or the terrorist history of the Dawa party?  Or the cease-fire called by Sadr?  Or the lowering number of casualties by keeping soldiers on secluded bases?  Or anything?

"No U.S. soldier ever dies in vain because they're carrying out the missions of their commander in chief. And we honor all the service that they've provided." - Barack Obama

[ Parent ]
Your post inspired a blog post (0.00 / 0)
I had to get my disdain for these assholes off my chest. I attempted to find where it went bad when the media called them "volunteers."  

[ Parent ]
VetVoice on Facebook
VetVoice Recommends

"The War I Always Wanted,"
By Brandon Friedman

"The welcome mat for memoirs by veterans of operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom might never wear out so long as they write with the savvy of Brandon Friedman . . . Friedman's take is vivid, frank, precise and dramatic." --Military Times

"Add Brandon Friedman's The War I Always Wanted to the ranks of outstanding non-fiction produced by officers from elite combat units in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Always truthful, often excruciatingly so, The War I Always Wanted rises at numerous points to the level of literature." --Steven Pressfield, author of Gates of Fire

Buy The War I Always Wanted here.

"A Time To Lead,"
By General (Ret.) Wesley K. Clark

"A Time To Lead confirms the rewarding benefits of military service at a time when such service is experiencing considerable strain. It also includes a comprehensive description of America's current national imperatives, which deserve serious consideration." --General Alexander M. Haig, Jr., former Secretary of State

"This is a primer on leadership forged in battle and by decades of experience. . .This isn't just a book; it's a manual for leading people and living a good life." --Barry McCaffrey, General, USA (ret.)

Buy A Time to Lead here.

"Love My Rifle More Than You,"
By Kayla Williams

"Whip smart, sassy, with a mouth as foul as a sailor's, 28-year-old Sergeant Kayla Williams. . .tells what it's like to be a female soldier in Iraq." --Booklist

". . .echoes military memoirists from Julius Caesar to Ernie Pyle." --Publishers Weekly

". . .a shocking, on-the-ground view of one military woman's experience in Iraq." --Bookmarks Magazine

Buy Love My Rifle More Than You here.

"How to Break a Terrorist,"
By Matthew Alexander

"...a riveting, fast-paced account that reads like a first-rate thriller." --Publisher's Weekly

" ...an absorbing behind-the-scenes look at the secret intelligence war within a war." --Military.com

Buy How to Break a Terrorist here.

RSS Feed Links

Subscribe to VetVoice in a feed reader!

Subscribe to VetVoice by Email!

Diaries and comments at VetVoice do not necessarily represent the views of VoteVets.org. VetVoice will strive to remove any illegal material as soon as it is flagged. Similarly, VetVoice will use its discretion in determining whether to remove exceedingly offensive material. However, between posting and removal, any offensive or illegal material does not reflect the condoning or endorsing of said material by VoteVets.org or VetVoice.
Similarly, the views expressed on this website are those of the authors alone. Opinions on this website do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Defense or any of its components.
Menu

Front Page Writers
PTSD Resources
TBI Resources
IRR Information
Casualty Reports
VA Information
Support the Troops
Veteran Candidates We Support
Congressional Committees
Contact Your Elected Leaders
Sites We Like
Search

Advanced Search

Paid for VoteVets Political Action Committee. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. VoteVets Action Fund is a 501(c)(4) organization which primarily focuses on nonpartisan education and advocacy on behalf veterans and their families. VoteVets Political Action Committee is a federal political committee which primarily helps elect Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran candidates and educates about veterans and military issues aimed at influencing the outcome of the next election.

Site Design: Articulated Man

VoteVets Political Action and Vote Vets Action Fund are separate organizations.

Powered by: SoapBlox