Gates Continues to Make Sense

by: Brandon Friedman

Tue Sep 30, 2008 at 12:44:07 PM EDT


I'm not sold on Robert Gates yet, and, frankly, after the last six years, I'll never fully trust anyone associated at a high level with the Bush administration.  That said, Secretary Gates continues to present himself as a beacon of sanity in Bush's seemingly endless sea of stupidity.  Ann Scott Tyson of the Washington Post reports:

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates yesterday criticized the shock-and-awe strategy of the 2003 Iraq invasion and said the Pentagon's narrow focus on conventional combat operations proved costly when U.S. ground troops had to switch gears to try to stabilize that country.

The Pentagon bureaucracy failed to respond quickly enough to the military's need for innovative counterinsurgency operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, Gates said, and he called for reforms to make the institution more agile and flexible.

The military's struggle to adjust to the counterinsurgency mission in Iraq "came at a frightful human, financial and political cost," Gates told an audience of military officers at the National Defense University here. "For every heroic and resourceful innovation by troops and commanders on the battlefield, there was some institutional shortcoming at the Pentagon that they had to overcome," he said.

While having a military skilled in fighting major conventional ground wars is essential, Gates said, such a war is unlikely in the near future. Yet the Pentagon has placed comparatively too much emphasis on developing high-technology weapon systems aimed at potential state adversaries such as China or Russia that take years to develop, he said, noting that the 2009 budget contains more than $180 billion for such conventional systems.

Such weapons often envision a computerized, idealized version of warfare that Gates suggested is unrealistic.

"Be skeptical of systems analysis, computer models, game theories," he warned, adding that officers should "look askance" at notions of future conflict that imply "adversaries can be cowed, shocked or awed into submission, instead of being tracked down, hilltop by hilltop, house by house."

Having participated in counterinsurgency operations in both theaters, I'm continually not disappointed with Gates' view on how the U.S. military should be oriented.  Remember, this guy faces a withering barrage of high-tech, high-dollar defense contractors on a daily basis.  So credit where credit is due.  

My only concern is that he addresses the failures in process, but never touches on the prudence of starting the war in Iraq in the first place--or any future wars for that matter.  However, my hope is that this is because it's simply not his job to formulate policy.  As Defense Secretary, his job is to manage the military and implement those policies emanating from the White House and Capitol Hill.  And within that narrow context, he's doing a fine job so far as I can tell.

Brandon Friedman :: Gates Continues to Make Sense
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I read this (0.00 / 0)
A little while ago, and just sighed, for it's almost Exactly what many of us were saying, for years, but especially in the buildup to the Iraq Conflict and the start of Occupying Afghanistan, 7years, alot of lives and destruction, later!!

Gates does at least speak with sense and experiance, but he does so in political speak, not real speak, leaving to many doors open when read between the lines, as you point out.

'Hearts and Minds, "The ultimate victory will depend on the hearts and minds of the people who actually live there." -- President Lyndon Johnson


"About 7 years ago"...hate to even post this one. (4.00 / 1)
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/S...

About Gates, he's just too PC with a very long connection to the Bushes.


[ Parent ]
Can we link Gates' thoughts to what McCain has said? (4.00 / 1)
In June McCain says he would cut Military spending to pay for Corporate tax cuts.

http://www.openleft.com/showDi...

Recently, McCain attacks Obama for his plan to fund an increase in the Military.

http://politicalticker.blogs.c...


[ Parent ]
Here's a few recent reports......... (0.00 / 0)
Disbanding the Sunni Patrols: A Backlash Brewing?

The danger is that such rhetoric will be matched by action. Al-A'ghayde says that won't happen because the SOIs "are not armed militias." Still, both the U.S. military and the Iraqi government know that they cannot afford to let the SOIs fall through any cracks and feel alienated from either party.

As Stock Market Crashes in U.S.,Army General Odierno Warns of Revolt by Iraqis

"They're working toward this, but if they don't do this, the citizens over time will potentially start to move against the government if they have to wait too much longer for services or if they don't see progress in services," Gen. Ray Odierno said.

"What has happened is they have rejected al-Qaida, but if the government fails them, what would happen?" he said.

Petraeus In London: "Spiral Downwards" In Parts Of Afghanistan

Parts of Afghanistan have seen a "spiral downwards" of violence, the incoming US regional commander said Monday, adding the fight against Taliban forces would continue unabated through the winter.

And there's been some on the Kurds recently.

Now when the 'surge' began there were something like 130,000 troops in Iraq, there's something like 150,000 now, with a call down of 8,000 at the beginning of the year!

'Hearts and Minds, "The ultimate victory will depend on the hearts and minds of the people who actually live there." -- President Lyndon Johnson


Integrity is not a commodity (0.00 / 0)
Those who think Gates is not a war criminal, raise your hand.

The war crimes is a list of criminal acts carried out under the banner of war.  Bush/Cheney invaded/occupied Iraq, and those crimes continue.  Gates doesn't have any more integrity than Powell.  Would you stay on in an administration that engages in war crimes?  What do you think about those that do?  Are they not part of the war criminal cabal, junto that seeks to destroy every last vestige of democracy we have left?


VetVoice on Facebook
VetVoice Recommends

"The War I Always Wanted,"
By Brandon Friedman

"The welcome mat for memoirs by veterans of operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom might never wear out so long as they write with the savvy of Brandon Friedman . . . Friedman's take is vivid, frank, precise and dramatic." --Military Times

"Add Brandon Friedman's The War I Always Wanted to the ranks of outstanding non-fiction produced by officers from elite combat units in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Always truthful, often excruciatingly so, The War I Always Wanted rises at numerous points to the level of literature." --Steven Pressfield, author of Gates of Fire

Buy The War I Always Wanted here.

"A Time To Lead,"
By General (Ret.) Wesley K. Clark

"A Time To Lead confirms the rewarding benefits of military service at a time when such service is experiencing considerable strain. It also includes a comprehensive description of America's current national imperatives, which deserve serious consideration." --General Alexander M. Haig, Jr., former Secretary of State

"This is a primer on leadership forged in battle and by decades of experience. . .This isn't just a book; it's a manual for leading people and living a good life." --Barry McCaffrey, General, USA (ret.)

Buy A Time to Lead here.

"Love My Rifle More Than You,"
By Kayla Williams

"Whip smart, sassy, with a mouth as foul as a sailor's, 28-year-old Sergeant Kayla Williams. . .tells what it's like to be a female soldier in Iraq." --Booklist

". . .echoes military memoirists from Julius Caesar to Ernie Pyle." --Publishers Weekly

". . .a shocking, on-the-ground view of one military woman's experience in Iraq." --Bookmarks Magazine

Buy Love My Rifle More Than You here.

"How to Break a Terrorist,"
By Matthew Alexander

"...a riveting, fast-paced account that reads like a first-rate thriller." --Publisher's Weekly

" ...an absorbing behind-the-scenes look at the secret intelligence war within a war." --Military.com

Buy How to Break a Terrorist here.

RSS Feed Links

Subscribe to VetVoice in a feed reader!

Subscribe to VetVoice by Email!

Diaries and comments at VetVoice do not necessarily represent the views of VoteVets.org. VetVoice will strive to remove any illegal material as soon as it is flagged. Similarly, VetVoice will use its discretion in determining whether to remove exceedingly offensive material. However, between posting and removal, any offensive or illegal material does not reflect the condoning or endorsing of said material by VoteVets.org or VetVoice.
Similarly, the views expressed on this website are those of the authors alone. Opinions on this website do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Defense or any of its components.
Menu

Front Page Writers
PTSD Resources
TBI Resources
IRR Information
Casualty Reports
VA Information
Support the Troops
Veteran Candidates We Support
Congressional Committees
Contact Your Elected Leaders
Sites We Like
Search

Advanced Search

Paid for VoteVets Political Action Committee. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. VoteVets Action Fund is a 501(c)(4) organization which primarily focuses on nonpartisan education and advocacy on behalf veterans and their families. VoteVets Political Action Committee is a federal political committee which primarily helps elect Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran candidates and educates about veterans and military issues aimed at influencing the outcome of the next election.

Site Design: Articulated Man

VoteVets Political Action and Vote Vets Action Fund are separate organizations.

Powered by: SoapBlox