"Aspirational Goals" or "A Withdrawal Accord"

by: Chris LeJeune

Thu Nov 20, 2008 at 11:07:53 AM EST


Since the beginning of Operation Iraqi Freedom, President Bush has refused to set any kind of timeline that would determine how long our troops would remain on Iraqi soil. Much hyperbolic language has been used by his administration and their supporters describing a withdrawal timeline as a sign of surrender.  Several republican senators and congressmen have even gone so far as to refuse funding for our troops, because the bill had just such a timeline in it.  However, since the formation of the Iraqi government, a hard date of our withdrawal has been at the top of their priority list.  In 2007, a majority of the Iraqi parliament signed a resolution asking for our withdrawal.  More recently, Maliki has become more insistent on just such a timeline.  Iraqi National Security Adviser, Al-Roubaie has gone so far as to stress a "fixed date."  

All during this time however, the Bush administration has chosen to ignore the Iraqi government and push for "aspirational goals" or a conditions-based withdrawal. This has stirred up the Iraqi government and fomented so much distrust in the American government's willingness to cooperate that there was literally a fight on the floor of the Iraqi parliament yesterday. Now, as the SOFA nears completion, Bush steadfastly refuses to respect the wishes of the Iraqi government and continues to refer to aspirational goals and not fixed dates.  And yet, the Arabic version of the bill calls it a Withdrawal Accord.


WASHINGTON - Although the Pentagon officially has welcomed the new accord on a U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq, senior military officials are privately criticizing President Bush for giving Iraq more control over U.S. military operations for the next three years than the U.S. had ever contemplated.

At times, "President Bush wanted this deal more than the Iraqis did," said a senior administration official who closely monitored the negotiations.

This official, and others, all who spoke anonymously to be candid, offered a first glimpse into the dynamics of the secret negotiations, which gave Iraq almost unprecedented control over U.S. troops in the period between Jan. 1 and a final U.S. withdrawal from Iraq on Dec. 31, 2011.

As part of the accord, which U.S. and Iraqi officials signed in Baghdad on Monday, Iraq will have potential authority over U.S. military operations, intelligence-gathering, cargo shipments and even the mail sent to American troops. Foreign contractors are subject to Iraqi law. On Jan. 1, Iraq will assume control of the U.S.-fortified Green Zone in Baghdad, and of the nation's airspace.

At the same time in Washington, political pressures generated by Obama's victory, first in the primaries and then in the general election, led Bush to meet the Iraqi demands.

The Bush administration had sought a conventional status of forces agreement that would provide a semi-permanent basis for stationing troops in Iraq, while Obama campaigned on promises to withdraw all combat troops within 16 months of his inauguration. The Arabic language version calls the final agreement a withdrawal accord.

Here is the full text of the agreement.

Chris LeJeune :: "Aspirational Goals" or "A Withdrawal Accord"
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

No one will ever accuse the Shrub and his buds of ever having a (4.00 / 1)
clue when it comes to thinking of consequences or putting the good of the Military/Nation ahead of their personal-economic agendas. On the Cheap nation building...

I'm not sure what voices Shrub hears, but I don't think one of them is God's.

Footnote: Not sure where I saw this, but cable news had a vid of Bush at the G20 being totally ignored as other were shaking hands, doing the diplomatic embrassing and chatting.  


Here you go (4.00 / 1)
World leaders refuse to shake Bush's hand during G20 photo-op.

"No U.S. soldier ever dies in vain because they're carrying out the missions of their commander in chief. And we honor all the service that they've provided." - Barack Obama

[ Parent ]
How (0.00 / 0)
about no nation building?

[ Parent ]
How about a RGWOT that lasts forever? (4.00 / 1)


[ Parent ]
I (0.00 / 0)
think any form of War on Terror will last forever. Nation-building or no nation-building.

[ Parent ]
Counter productive (4.00 / 1)
Nation building in the image of the builder is counter productive.

That is the lesson from history.


[ Parent ]
I could (0.00 / 0)
not agree more. Problem is, that is exactly what we have been doing lately.  

[ Parent ]
Well that (0.00 / 0)
and I do not believe AQ is a terrorist organization, so the name RGWOT really doesn't mean much to me.  

[ Parent ]
Although (0.00 / 0)
I do think that we need to make any necessary presence on our part profitable to the locals.  

[ Parent ]
Well, anything that the US could do, (0.00 / 0)
working with the UN (say what you want about the UN, but they are the resident experts in nation-building) and with the regional and major powers to promote and facilitate a political settlement in the form of a power-sharing arrangement, among other things, between the many Iraqi factions would qualify as being profitable to the locals, no?

[ Parent ]
Probably (0.00 / 0)
not. Corruption runs rampant and the governing bodies don't necessarily care very much about their people. Well that, and the UN has a tendency to act large and in charge. Big No-no. I was thinking more along the lines of smalltime local projects,paying locals rent, etc/  

[ Parent ]
It just seems to me that what you are talking about - (0.00 / 0)
local improvements to the exclusion of progress on national political reconciliation - is going to resign the locals to a lifetime of living in a state of civil war, to one degree or another.

All I'm saying is that we ( the Iraqis, the US, the UN, the regional and major powers) can do much better than that.


[ Parent ]
Problem (0.00 / 0)
is that many of the borders in that particular region of the world were drawn by the West, rather than the people who actually live there. I am all for diplomacy, but I think we should adopt a less authoritarian approach to it. IE: Make suggestions, offer advice, etc.  

[ Parent ]
Absolutely, positively! (0.00 / 0)
And, on that happy note of agreement, I shall bid you a good night!

[ Parent ]
Frankly, I don't trust the Bush administration or the Iraqi government. (0.00 / 0)
It seems to me that PM Maliki is not exactly motivated by good intentions when preparing the way for the withdrawal of US forces.

I say that because he has, apparently, no inclination or intention to do all that will be required to achieve a sustainable political settlement while US troops wiithdraw, or after.


In my opinion, Maliki does not want political settlement (4.00 / 1)
If you look at his past, he has always seen the Sunnis as "opposition".  He fled to Iran in 1979, and then to Syria, and has been a major part of Shia coaltions in both countries.
He left Syria for Iran in 1982, where he lived until 1990, mostly in Tehran, before returing to Damascus where he remained until the 2003 US invasion toppled Hussein. In Syria he worked as a political officer for Dawa, developing close ties with Hezbollah and particularly with Iran.

"No U.S. soldier ever dies in vain because they're carrying out the missions of their commander in chief. And we honor all the service that they've provided." - Barack Obama

[ Parent ]
I couldn't agree more! (0.00 / 0)
And that doesn't bode well for the consequences of a US withdrawal.

We're just going to have to hope against hope that the next Secretary of State initmately understands what will be required to promote a political solution through a muscular diplomatic surge.

Of course, it wouldn't hurt if the next SoS also happens to be the next VP-elect! Hey, stranger things have already happened.


[ Parent ]
Lack of concept of how the US Government works... (0.00 / 0)
also, the word on the street is that Biden will be used to run the offense on very pressing domestic issues using his knowledge from serving on the judiciary committee, etc. and his long association with members of the Senate.

Also, it is time to realize that Iraq is sovereign.

In my opinion just as the "Kirkuk" question remains unsettled both the Shia and Kurds along with the 'friendly' OPEC nations are using US troops to further their own agendas.


[ Parent ]
The word ( on the street and in the media) on Biden is WRONG, as per usual. (0.00 / 0)
Also, it is time to realize that Biden already realizes that Iraq is sovereign. Geesh. His strategy is consistent with the Iraqi constitution and many of Iraq's sectarian leaders have long been on board with the essential elements of what he has been proposing.

But, you're right - there are lots of agendas at work here!


[ Parent ]
Well (0.00 / 0)
he can't exactly be shrouded in legitimacy, seeing that he lived in exile for 20+ years.

[ Parent ]
One Thing We Don't Hear About... (0.00 / 0)
and of the nation's airspace.

I don't hear much, if anything at all, but is there training of Iraq chopper pilots and even fighter pilots?

If so I can picture a number of scenarios where this could be a Major problem in a still Unstable Government there.  

'Hearts and Minds, "The ultimate victory will depend on the hearts and minds of the people who actually live there." -- President Lyndon Johnson


VetVoice on Social Media
Follow rockrichard on Twitter

VoteVets.org on Facebook
  • VetVoice Recommends

    "The War I Always Wanted,"
    By Brandon Friedman

    "The welcome mat for memoirs by veterans of operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom might never wear out so long as they write with the savvy of Brandon Friedman . . . Friedman's take is vivid, frank, precise and dramatic." --Military Times

    "Add Brandon Friedman's The War I Always Wanted to the ranks of outstanding non-fiction produced by officers from elite combat units in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Always truthful, often excruciatingly so, The War I Always Wanted rises at numerous points to the level of literature." --Steven Pressfield, author of Gates of Fire

    Buy The War I Always Wanted here.

    "A Time To Lead,"
    By General (Ret.) Wesley K. Clark

    "A Time To Lead confirms the rewarding benefits of military service at a time when such service is experiencing considerable strain. It also includes a comprehensive description of America's current national imperatives, which deserve serious consideration." --General Alexander M. Haig, Jr., former Secretary of State

    "This is a primer on leadership forged in battle and by decades of experience. . .This isn't just a book; it's a manual for leading people and living a good life." --Barry McCaffrey, General, USA (ret.)

    Buy A Time to Lead here.

    "Love My Rifle More Than You,"
    By Kayla Williams

    "Whip smart, sassy, with a mouth as foul as a sailor's, 28-year-old Sergeant Kayla Williams. . .tells what it's like to be a female soldier in Iraq." --Booklist

    ". . .echoes military memoirists from Julius Caesar to Ernie Pyle." --Publishers Weekly

    ". . .a shocking, on-the-ground view of one military woman's experience in Iraq." --Bookmarks Magazine

    Buy Love My Rifle More Than You here.

    "How to Break a Terrorist,"
    By Matthew Alexander

    "...a riveting, fast-paced account that reads like a first-rate thriller." --Publisher's Weekly

    " ...an absorbing behind-the-scenes look at the secret intelligence war within a war." --Military.com

    Buy How to Break a Terrorist here.

    Search

    Advanced Search

    RSS Feed Links

    Subscribe to VetVoice in a feed reader!

    Subscribe to VetVoice by Email!

    Diaries and comments at VetVoice do not necessarily represent the views of VoteVets.org. VetVoice will strive to remove any illegal material as soon as it is flagged. Similarly, VetVoice will use its discretion in determining whether to remove exceedingly offensive material. However, between posting and removal, any offensive or illegal material does not reflect the condoning or endorsing of said material by VoteVets.org or VetVoice.
    Similarly, the views expressed on this website are those of the authors alone. Opinions on this website do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Defense or any of its components.
    Menu

    Front Page Writers
    PTSD Resources
    TBI Resources
    IRR Information
    Casualty Reports
    VA Information
    Support the Troops
    Veteran Candidates We Support
    Congressional Committees
    Contact Your Elected Leaders
    Sites We Like

    Paid for VoteVets Political Action Committee. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. VoteVets Action Fund is a 501(c)(4) organization which primarily focuses on nonpartisan education and advocacy on behalf veterans and their families. VoteVets Political Action Committee is a federal political committee which primarily helps elect Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran candidates and educates about veterans and military issues aimed at influencing the outcome of the next election.

    Site Design: Articulated Man

    VoteVets Political Action and Vote Vets Action Fund are separate organizations.

    Powered by: SoapBlox