General Petraeus Recommends Taking Some Time On Afghan Strategy

by: Chris LeJeune

Sat Nov 14, 2009 at 13:53:17 PM EST



As President Obama has been weighing his various options on Afghanistan, many on the right wing have accused him of dithering, or not acting fast enough.  Many are concerned that President Obama is taking too much time weighing, planning, and deciding, and not enough time acting.  The common right-wing meme is that while President Obama waits, soldiers are dying.  But the commanders in the field are not the ones saying this.  In fact, it is quite the opposite.  I have already written about Ambassador Eikenberry, a retired Lt. General who commanded US foreces in Afghanistan in 2006-2007.  He is now the US envoy in Afghanistan and he has recommended against adding more troops.  Now General Petraeus is also cautioning that this decision should not be rushed:

WASHINGTON, Nov. 13, 2009 - The time President Barack Obama is taking to nail down the strategy in Afghanistan is time well spent, the commander of U.S. Central Command said today.

Army Gen. David H. Petraeus spoke at the Navy Memorial here as part of the American Veterans Center Annual Conference. He based his words not only on his current experiences, he said, but also on his experiences as the commander in Iraq.

In Iraq, getting the right strategy was just as important as the surge in personnel, the general said. "The real key in Iraq was the surge of ideas, not just the surge of troops," Petraeus said. "Yes, the 30,000 additional troops that ended up being deployed during the surge enabled us to ... implement time-honored counterinsurgency concepts more effectively and more rapidly than we could have."

As attention shifts to Afghanistan, Petraeus said, people must remember that Afghanistan is not Iraq.

At the same time, General Petraeus recognized the various difficulties and unique issues faced in Afghanistan, some of the mistakes of the past, and the need to take all of these situations into account.


All this goes into the president's decision on the strategy in Afghanistan and the number of forces needed to institute it, Petraeus said, and he added that the decision-making process is good and healthy for the leaders and the country.

When the Iraq and Afghan strategies were first formulated in this administration in March, he said, the process was rushed. The current process has allowed Obama to engage in forming the process in a way he did not before, the general said.

"There have been very good debates, very good discussion," he said. "This is the kind of intellectual discourse you want. It does sharpen your thinking. It does expose differences of opinion. It helps you come to grips with the assumptions."

The president has committed an enormous amount of time to the process, and it is an appropriate use of his time, Petraeus said. "This decision will be forthcoming pretty soon, perhaps when he comes back from the Asia trip, and then we will all press forward," he said. "And I think we will do so with enormous benefit from having had these discussions."

Chris LeJeune :: General Petraeus Recommends Taking Some Time On Afghan Strategy
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Gates "appalled" at leaks about Afghanistan and Ft Hood (0.00 / 0)
He said leaks were coming from Pentagon and other parts of the government.

Petreaus may have spent some time behind the wood shed with those up the chain. Or he has seen that the 'leak' strategy has had a negative effect on his power.  Anyway, it is good to see some deference to the CiC.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...


The cost as a factor in the Afghanistan decision... (0.00 / 0)
[Obama is on an Asia tour which will include an economic summit]

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11...


[ Parent ]
The problem is (0.00 / 0)
Americans are so used to the Bush methodology of making rash decisions without thinking about their implications, that actually taking a fucking second to think about whether or not something is a good idea is called "dithering". No, its called deliberate decision making.  

I'm on twitter.

VetVoice on Facebook
VetVoice Recommends

"The War I Always Wanted,"
By Brandon Friedman

"The welcome mat for memoirs by veterans of operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom might never wear out so long as they write with the savvy of Brandon Friedman . . . Friedman's take is vivid, frank, precise and dramatic." --Military Times

"Add Brandon Friedman's The War I Always Wanted to the ranks of outstanding non-fiction produced by officers from elite combat units in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Always truthful, often excruciatingly so, The War I Always Wanted rises at numerous points to the level of literature." --Steven Pressfield, author of Gates of Fire

Buy The War I Always Wanted here.

"A Time To Lead,"
By General (Ret.) Wesley K. Clark

"A Time To Lead confirms the rewarding benefits of military service at a time when such service is experiencing considerable strain. It also includes a comprehensive description of America's current national imperatives, which deserve serious consideration." --General Alexander M. Haig, Jr., former Secretary of State

"This is a primer on leadership forged in battle and by decades of experience. . .This isn't just a book; it's a manual for leading people and living a good life." --Barry McCaffrey, General, USA (ret.)

Buy A Time to Lead here.

"Love My Rifle More Than You,"
By Kayla Williams

"Whip smart, sassy, with a mouth as foul as a sailor's, 28-year-old Sergeant Kayla Williams. . .tells what it's like to be a female soldier in Iraq." --Booklist

". . .echoes military memoirists from Julius Caesar to Ernie Pyle." --Publishers Weekly

". . .a shocking, on-the-ground view of one military woman's experience in Iraq." --Bookmarks Magazine

Buy Love My Rifle More Than You here.

"How to Break a Terrorist,"
By Matthew Alexander

"...a riveting, fast-paced account that reads like a first-rate thriller." --Publisher's Weekly

" ...an absorbing behind-the-scenes look at the secret intelligence war within a war." --Military.com

Buy How to Break a Terrorist here.

RSS Feed Links

Subscribe to VetVoice in a feed reader!

Subscribe to VetVoice by Email!

Diaries and comments at VetVoice do not necessarily represent the views of VoteVets.org. VetVoice will strive to remove any illegal material as soon as it is flagged. Similarly, VetVoice will use its discretion in determining whether to remove exceedingly offensive material. However, between posting and removal, any offensive or illegal material does not reflect the condoning or endorsing of said material by VoteVets.org or VetVoice.
Similarly, the views expressed on this website are those of the authors alone. Opinions on this website do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Defense or any of its components.
Menu

Front Page Writers
PTSD Resources
TBI Resources
IRR Information
Casualty Reports
VA Information
Support the Troops
Veteran Candidates We Support
Congressional Committees
Contact Your Elected Leaders
Sites We Like
Search

Advanced Search

Paid for VoteVets Political Action Committee. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. VoteVets Action Fund is a 501(c)(4) organization which primarily focuses on nonpartisan education and advocacy on behalf veterans and their families. VoteVets Political Action Committee is a federal political committee which primarily helps elect Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran candidates and educates about veterans and military issues aimed at influencing the outcome of the next election.

Site Design: Articulated Man

VoteVets Political Action and Vote Vets Action Fund are separate organizations.

Powered by: SoapBlox