July 2011: What we Still Don't Know

by: Richard Allen Smith

Wed Dec 02, 2009 at 12:03:46 PM EST


In his speech on the way ahead in Afghanistan last night, the President articulated a time line for which we can expect to begin withdrawal from the war in that country:

Taken together, these additional American and international troops will allow us to accelerate handing over responsibility to Afghan forces, and allow us to begin the transfer of our forces out of Afghanistan in July of 2011. Just as we have done in Iraq, we will execute this transition responsibly, taking into account conditions on the ground.

However, conflicting statements and the realities of the situation on the ground leave questions about such a goal.  First, the President notes that such a date will rely on the conditions on the ground.  What does that mean exactly?  Is it a possibility that the July 2011 date could be pushed back if commanders, including the President himself, deem it unrealistic?

CNAS President, influential wonk and counterinsurgency guru John Nagl (who literally wrote the books on COIN co-authoring the field manual, as well as his own book on the subject) believes that the deadline is something to hope for, but not something we should take to the bank.

Similarly, Nicholas Beaudrot notes that DoD officials have told him that:

"The ultimate goal is to have Afghanistan be  sovereign country that can stay in charge of its own security." The summer of 2011 isn't a necessarily time where we can expect to be at this ultimate goal. In fact, we might not be particularly close to it. But at the least, hopefully [hopefully? yeah, you're telling me], we'll be at a point where. "based on the conditions today, based upon the inputs that we're putting in over the coming months, we have a very good expectation ... that the Afghans will be ready to start assuming this lead responsibility, and allow our troops to start coming home as the President said".

Likewise, OpenLeft's Chris Bowers notes that the definition of "transition" has remained undefined:

I just had a chance to talk with three senior Obama administration officials.  In regards to President Obama's statement that "after 18 months, our troops will begin to come home," I asked for clarification on how many troops would be coming home in eighteen months, and at what rate would they be coming home.

The answers made it clear that there is no actual timeline for withdrawing troops from Afghanistan:

   * There is no defined rate for, or number of troops involved in, the 2011 withdrawal.

   * They will be "taking conditions on the ground into account" in determining the withdrawal.

   * The withdrawal is "a goal."

Additionally, we have two conflicting statements from the Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who was reported today by Reuters to indicate that the July 2011 date is not dependent on ground conditions, while at the same time noting to the Senate Armed Services Committee that:

"We're not just going to throw these guys in the swimming pool and walk away," Gates told the committee. "It will be based on conditions on the ground but at the same time... we have to build a fire under them frankly to get them to do the kind of recruitment and retention that allows us to make this transition."

Taking all this information together, this is what I've come up with:  In mid-2011, U.S. forces will do something in Afghanistan with regards to transitioning out of the conflict.  In a best case scenario, we will begin turning over leadership and responsibility to the Afghan Security Forces and government and begin withdrawing troops.  Otherwise, my speculation is that it will be some sort of token act like giving greater responsibilities to the ANSF in the North and West which have been more stable over the years then the East and South, or increasing the visibility of Afghan leadership in American operations.  Or, it could be something as minuscule as conducting another strategy review to determine if the conditions on the ground are conducive to any transition at all. Basically, (and again, this is just my speculation) if things don't go well we'll still see something done for the sake of doing something, but that something may not have much of an impact.

Richard Allen Smith :: July 2011: What we Still Don't Know
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

VetVoice on Social Media
Follow rockrichard on Twitter

VoteVets.org on Facebook
  • VetVoice Recommends

    "The War I Always Wanted,"
    By Brandon Friedman

    "The welcome mat for memoirs by veterans of operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom might never wear out so long as they write with the savvy of Brandon Friedman . . . Friedman's take is vivid, frank, precise and dramatic." --Military Times

    "Add Brandon Friedman's The War I Always Wanted to the ranks of outstanding non-fiction produced by officers from elite combat units in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Always truthful, often excruciatingly so, The War I Always Wanted rises at numerous points to the level of literature." --Steven Pressfield, author of Gates of Fire

    Buy The War I Always Wanted here.

    "A Time To Lead,"
    By General (Ret.) Wesley K. Clark

    "A Time To Lead confirms the rewarding benefits of military service at a time when such service is experiencing considerable strain. It also includes a comprehensive description of America's current national imperatives, which deserve serious consideration." --General Alexander M. Haig, Jr., former Secretary of State

    "This is a primer on leadership forged in battle and by decades of experience. . .This isn't just a book; it's a manual for leading people and living a good life." --Barry McCaffrey, General, USA (ret.)

    Buy A Time to Lead here.

    "Love My Rifle More Than You,"
    By Kayla Williams

    "Whip smart, sassy, with a mouth as foul as a sailor's, 28-year-old Sergeant Kayla Williams. . .tells what it's like to be a female soldier in Iraq." --Booklist

    ". . .echoes military memoirists from Julius Caesar to Ernie Pyle." --Publishers Weekly

    ". . .a shocking, on-the-ground view of one military woman's experience in Iraq." --Bookmarks Magazine

    Buy Love My Rifle More Than You here.

    "How to Break a Terrorist,"
    By Matthew Alexander

    "...a riveting, fast-paced account that reads like a first-rate thriller." --Publisher's Weekly

    " ...an absorbing behind-the-scenes look at the secret intelligence war within a war." --Military.com

    Buy How to Break a Terrorist here.

    Search

    Advanced Search

    RSS Feed Links

    Subscribe to VetVoice in a feed reader!

    Subscribe to VetVoice by Email!

    Diaries and comments at VetVoice do not necessarily represent the views of VoteVets.org. VetVoice will strive to remove any illegal material as soon as it is flagged. Similarly, VetVoice will use its discretion in determining whether to remove exceedingly offensive material. However, between posting and removal, any offensive or illegal material does not reflect the condoning or endorsing of said material by VoteVets.org or VetVoice.
    Similarly, the views expressed on this website are those of the authors alone. Opinions on this website do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Defense or any of its components.
    Menu

    Front Page Writers
    PTSD Resources
    TBI Resources
    IRR Information
    Casualty Reports
    VA Information
    Support the Troops
    Veteran Candidates We Support
    Congressional Committees
    Contact Your Elected Leaders
    Sites We Like

    Paid for VoteVets Political Action Committee. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. VoteVets Action Fund is a 501(c)(4) organization which primarily focuses on nonpartisan education and advocacy on behalf veterans and their families. VoteVets Political Action Committee is a federal political committee which primarily helps elect Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran candidates and educates about veterans and military issues aimed at influencing the outcome of the next election.

    Site Design: Articulated Man

    VoteVets Political Action and Vote Vets Action Fund are separate organizations.

    Powered by: SoapBlox