Shi'ite Happens

by: LT Nixon

Sun Mar 30, 2008 at 21:45:11 PM EDT


The recent outbreak of violence in Basra, Kut, Diwaniyah, Karbala, and Baghdad is certainly troubling and very complex.  Many people have stated that it is a Shi'ite power struggle, possibly for the Supreme Iraqi Islamic Council (SIIC) and Dawa party to secure votes in the upcoming provincial elections by knocking out the Sadr movement.  This is partially correct, but there are some other factors going on here.  Perhaps it's best to put the Sadrists and their militia, the Jaish Al-Mahdi (JAM) into some quick historical context.

2006 - The holy Al-Askari shrine in Samarra was bombed by Al-Qaeda unleashing escalating sectarian violence throughout Iraq.  Car bombs in Baghdad targeting Shi'ite civilians were frequent, and the Coalition and Iraqi security forces are unable to provide adequate security as the city descends into chaos.  The Mahdi Army is seen as a protector by the majority Shi'ite population who can fend off Al-Qaeda terrorists (who happen to be Sunni).  Unfortunately, this involves forced displacement, torture of Sunni citizens, racketeering of meager services that are handed out by the Iraqi government, and other mob-style tactics.

Early 2007 - Surge is launched and Operation Fardh al-Qanoon is put into place in Baghdad.  This involves stepped up security with a curfew, more checkpoints, massive travel restrictions, and the infamous T-walls along sectarian faultlines.  This helps quell the raging ethnosectarian violence, and the heavy-handed tactics of the Mahdi army become less popular as they are seen as gangland thugs as opposed to protectors.

Aug 2007 - The Mahdi Army fights with Iraqi Security Forces in the holy city of Karbala in a dispute over who gets certain mosque fees during the pilgrimage that was taking place.  Dozens are killed during this holy event, and the Mahdi Army is completely disgraced.  Sadr orders a ceasefire over his militia to "rehabilitate" the movement.

Oct. 2007 - Sadr and his rival from SIIC, Abdul Aziz Hakim, sign a truce to end Shi'ite on Shi'ite bloodshed in southern Iraq.  This is seen as a positive development at the time, but doesn't really come to fruition.  In Diwaniyah and Sadr City, US and Iraqi forces target "rogue" elements of the Mahdi Army.  The Sadrists claim that the US and Iraqi Security Forces (which are dominated by Badr Corps, the militia of SIIC) are using the ceasefire to target their members.  The Sadrists fail to acknowledge that these "rogue" groups are receiving weapons from Iran and continuing their criminal activities despite the ceasefire.

Mar 2008 - Sadr issues a statement saying that the Mahdi Army has the right to "self-defense".  This is used by militiamen in Kut to justify a small-scale offensive which is quickly squashed by the Iraqi security forces.  Maliki, out of the blue, launches a massive operation in Basrah on Mar 25, and the rest is history still developing.

Sadr and the Mahdi Army are dissimilar from Al-Qaeda in that they actually do have some popular support amongst working class and poverty-stricken Shi'ites.  SIIC and Dawa, which is Prime Minister Maliki's party, generally gets support from middle/upper-class Shi'ites.  Unfortunately, many of those people have fled the country as years of war have targeted the professional class in Iraq.  I once heard Basrah described as similar to Chicago in the 1920s.  Instead of gangs with tommy guns, it's dudes with Ak-47s and RPGs and replace the bathtub gin with oil and you've got Iraq's second largest city.  Iran has tremendous influence over many of these militias and provides them with weapons and training.  However, this is most likely a method to diminish credibility of the "evil satanic" coalition forces, and an unstable Basrah is not in Iran's best interest.  As a matter of fact, an unstable Iraq is not in Iran's best interest as one of the most brutal wars in the latter part of the 20th century was fought between Iraq and Iran and no one wants to see that again.  That's probably why the Iranian foreign minister recently called for an end to the crisis in Basrah.  Despite what many wags in the media have been saying, the Mahdi Army has been getting crippled militarily throughout Iraq, and this is likely why Sadr called for a full scale uprising on Al-Jazeera one day, then a ceasefire the next day.  Whether or not the Mahdi Army will actually stop its criminal activities this time around is in question.  It would be very difficult to militarily eradicate militias in Iraq, because their existence fills a vacuum.   I won't discuss Bush's ridiculous comments about the whole situation and the fact that this means we are going to have to stay here awhile because it's too depressing (coalition assets were required for the operations in Basrah and Baghdad).  I also can't discuss incidents in the Green Zone for OPSEC reasons.  I just wanted to dispel this myth running through the blogosphere and media that somehow US and Iraqi forces were tactically "losing" to a bunch of thugs.  The only way to approach this problem is to build legitimate security forces and for the Iraqi government to adequately provide services which will negate the need for these Hezbollah-style groups to control Iraq.  Sadly, that will take years of American involvement with our current strategy.  That's been the paradox of this whole war, all the firepower in the world, and we can't get these people to stop killing each other.

LT Nixon :: Shi'ite Happens
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Shi'ite Happens | 20 comments
Thank you for a very complete analysis. (0.00 / 0)
So, as usual, I have a number of questions I would like to get your perspective on.

You refer repeatedly to the Iraqi Security Forces.

This is used by militiamen in Kut to justify a small-scale offensive which is quickly squashed by the Iraqi security forces

Who makes up these forces?  Is this a group of Sunnis, Shia, and Kurds all working together for the common good of Iraq?  Or is it primarily Badr Corps/SIIC/DAWA?

Secondly, you stated that

It would be very difficult to militarily eradicate militias in Iraq, because their existence fills a vacuum.

I agree.  But that begs the question, what is our military objective there?  In other words, if our tankers, artillerymen, Bradley gunners, etc., are not killing off all of the militias, then what are they doing there, and when d they get to leave?  If the eradication of militias is not the definition of victory, then what is?

Finally, in all of this, the Mahdi vs. SIIC vs militia X, who do we support?  Who are the good guys - besides the Americans?  

I hear all the time that if we leave there will be this mass genocide, and that our troops are there to prevent that.  But how?  If we see one group of Iraqis killing another group of Iraqis, which side do we jump in on?

Thank you again, for taking the time to discuss all of this.

"No U.S. soldier ever dies in vain because they're carrying out the missions of their commander in chief. And we honor all the service that they've provided." - Barack Obama


The ISF... (0.00 / 0)
...is compromised of various groups.  They've really tried to clamp down on the militia influence in the last year or so.  The Iraqi Army is pretty professional, but some of the Iraqi Police, you'll see that militia-allegiance.

Our military objective right now is to target those comitting violence.  Priority #1 is supposed to be Al-Qaeda in Iraq (who can't really be negotiated with), but now we've been dragged into this crisis.  

The good guys are the democratically-elected government.

Sorry to blabber on like Public Affairs guy, but I gotta go find some hard-cover =) .  Later, stay tuned, who knows what'll happen in Iraq today (I sure don't).  


[ Parent ]
Excellent breakdown (4.00 / 1)
I was wondering, tho, when does it become official that the Shi'ite has hit the fan?

[ Parent ]
Al-Sadr wins by keeping a force in being (0.00 / 0)
Moqtada al-Sadr has done this before, in 2004.  He is smart enough to arrange a cease-fire before his enemies can deliver a knockout blow.  He keeps his force in being, and reaps all the political/economic rewards that go to a popular movement modeled on Hezbollah.

It seems that the Sadrists made their point: when they send armed men onto the streets they can defeat all comers.  

I have questions, too.  Did Maliki really mount his offensive "out of the blue"?  Back on March 13, the IHT and NYT reported: Iraqi troops expected to reclaim Basra's port.  Also, if true this story does not reflect well on the state of cooperation between Maliki's government and the US command.

Are you sure that VP Dick Cheney's recent visit to Iraq had nothing to do with the decision to attack the Mahdi Army?


Hezbollah... (0.00 / 0)
...is a lot like the Mahdi Army movement and it's not going to be defeated militarily or wiped out, I absolutely agree.  I'm a bit sketchy on the Cheney link, because I think he may have pressured VP Mehdi (a SIIC guy) to rescind his veto on the Provincial Powers Law, but that's what the Sadrists wanted!  There's a lot of shit going on here, but I don't know if Cheney is really that involved.

[ Parent ]
Thank you. (0.00 / 0)
You mentioned that our military objective is to target those who are committing the violence, but how do we know who that is?  If soldiers witness one group of Iraqis firing on another, which side do they jump in on?  This has been one of my biggest problems with OIF.  The soldier on the ground needs to know who to shoot.

Funny that you mentioned the Iraqi Police.  We used to always make fun of them because they were always sleeping.  In 2003/2004, my unit was tasked with providing security for Baghdad police stations.  Basically we would stand around outside of their stations in Baghdad or Sadr City and wait for something to happen.  The Iraqi police were generally around just to beg for food, sleep, or lose their weapons.  One even had an AD when we were in Sadr City and shot the toilet with his little tiny handgun, trying to get it out of his waistband.

Finally, you mentioned that the good guys are the democratically elected government.  But doesn't that include a bunch of Badr guys, Sunni militia supporters, and people that are loyal to Sadr? In other words, are there any "good guys" in Iraq that actually like Americans?

Go find some hard cover and stay safe :)

"No U.S. soldier ever dies in vain because they're carrying out the missions of their commander in chief. And we honor all the service that they've provided." - Barack Obama


In the case of Baghdad... (0.00 / 0)
...I think our guys are shooting people who are shooting at them in New Baghdad, Kadimiyah, outskirts of Sadr City, etc. The Sadr ceasefire effectively makes anyone on the streets with a weapon a criminal.  Thanks for the anecdote about the IPs, I've heard that from a lot of people, unfortunately.  Thanks for the well wishes.

[ Parent ]
So much has changed (0.00 / 0)
And yet so much has stayed the same.  A co-worker of mine who was never in the military had heard that we cannot shoot first in Iraq - the whole "don't shoot till fired upon" concept.  I had to explain to him that we generally don't know who the enemy is until they shoot at us.  Then, the enemy is whoever happens to be shooting at you.  

You mentioned that anyone on the streets with a weapon is a criminal.  That is different from when I was there.  They were allowed to have an AK, but nothing larger.  One AK per vehicle or per household. I had to go with Civil Affairs a few times to return confiscated AK's back to homes they had been seized from.

"No U.S. soldier ever dies in vain because they're carrying out the missions of their commander in chief. And we honor all the service that they've provided." - Barack Obama


[ Parent ]
Well I use the term metaphorically (0.00 / 0)
I should say that anyone on the streets shooting a weapon randomly is a criminal.

[ Parent ]
Thanks for the analysis. (0.00 / 0)
Good to see you writing again.  But you're still talking about attacks by "al Qaeda."  I still want to know who attacked the Askari Mosque.  Was it guys who'd trained in Afghanistan with Osama bin Laden?  Saudis?  Or was it Sunni militia members from Iraq?

This says the attack was masterminded by Haitham al-Badri, an Iraqi government official under Saddam Hussein.  


Thanks for providing this perspective and analysis (0.00 / 0)
I strongly agree with your point that internal power struggles are likely to continue in Iraq for some time to come.  I wonder if the continued US presence is in fact prolonging the power struggle by insulating the competing forces from each other...

On the tactical issue, I guess I'm a little confused by your report that the JAM is being crippled in military confrontations.  News reports here indicate that al Sadr's forces have captured symbolically important targets (government vehicles, television stations, etc), have provoked many government security forces to defect or surrender, have effectively stopped normal activity in Baghdad (and elsewhere) through violent and nonviolent acts (resulting in the curfew), and have retained control of much of Basra.  Additionally, now it looks like high-ranking members of Dawa and ISCI bypassed Maliki and traveled to Iran to negotiate directly with al Sadr.  Furthermore, it appears that the government forces called on their friends in IRGC to apply pressure to al Sadr to accept a cease fire agreement.  The cease fire agreement seems somewhat favorable to al Sadr.  My point is that the information making its way back to the US strongly suggests that the government forces either did not expect resistance from al Sadr, were unable to effectively react to that resistance, or both.  It just seems like our information doesn't really match yours...

Keep in mind that I'm not cheerleading for al Sadr.  It just seems weird to me that sources in Iraq (you, media outlets, etc) are not only drawing different conclusions, but seem to be working with different sets of facts.


There is a huge fog of war... (0.00 / 0)
...in Basrah and media reporting was pretty sketchy.  I probably can't discuss too much, but let's just say the death toll for the enemy in Baghdad was...really high!  But now they have gone back to their dayjobs for the time being and it will be a huge humanitarian mess to clean up.  This place is always a mess.  

[ Parent ]
Dm... (4.00 / 1)
...yeah the thing with Iran was weird, eh?  Apparently the ceasefire was brokered by the senior Quds Force Commander!?!  WTF.  That group is on our terrorist list. This place gets stranger by the day, especially the politics.

[ Parent ]
Which is why we really shouldn't be playing (0.00 / 0)
that great a role in it.  We have no idea what it's all about.

[ Parent ]
definitely an interesting turn of events (4.00 / 1)
Yeah, this news certainly shows that the Iraqi government serves two masters.  It makes me question why the US isn't talking to Iran (assuming that we're not doing so behind the scenes); a little coordination would probably go a long way towards a more stable Iraq.

[ Parent ]
When you return to the States, (0.00 / 0)
I really hope you'll write a book, and the title of it just HAS to be Shi'ite Happens! (Or at least a subtitle).
Excellent!

Juan Cole has a pretty good breakdown (0.00 / 0)
of the situation, including a timeline here.

"No U.S. soldier ever dies in vain because they're carrying out the missions of their commander in chief. And we honor all the service that they've provided." - Barack Obama

Great Info.... (0.00 / 0)
In the midst of some tough fighting, you can write a piece like this!  After all the other comments, my Thank You may seem trivial, but it's sincere.  The more I read from you and others on the scene, the more the "real" facts are giving me second thoughts and highlighting the lack of intelligent media coverage here.

I have a question too (about Iran's influence in all this) but since clejeune and others already beat me in tapping your mind and time, I'll pass.  Thanks again, and take care.


Haha... (0.00 / 0)
...thanks ernliz, but I was doing some tough cowering, but no fighting.  For a good read on a first-hand view from the street of some fighting check out the Angry American.  Excellent first hand account.

[ Parent ]
Shi'ite Happens | 20 comments
VetVoice on Social Media
Follow rockrichard on Twitter

VoteVets.org on Facebook
  • VetVoice Recommends

    "The War I Always Wanted,"
    By Brandon Friedman

    "The welcome mat for memoirs by veterans of operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom might never wear out so long as they write with the savvy of Brandon Friedman . . . Friedman's take is vivid, frank, precise and dramatic." --Military Times

    "Add Brandon Friedman's The War I Always Wanted to the ranks of outstanding non-fiction produced by officers from elite combat units in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Always truthful, often excruciatingly so, The War I Always Wanted rises at numerous points to the level of literature." --Steven Pressfield, author of Gates of Fire

    Buy The War I Always Wanted here.

    "A Time To Lead,"
    By General (Ret.) Wesley K. Clark

    "A Time To Lead confirms the rewarding benefits of military service at a time when such service is experiencing considerable strain. It also includes a comprehensive description of America's current national imperatives, which deserve serious consideration." --General Alexander M. Haig, Jr., former Secretary of State

    "This is a primer on leadership forged in battle and by decades of experience. . .This isn't just a book; it's a manual for leading people and living a good life." --Barry McCaffrey, General, USA (ret.)

    Buy A Time to Lead here.

    "Love My Rifle More Than You,"
    By Kayla Williams

    "Whip smart, sassy, with a mouth as foul as a sailor's, 28-year-old Sergeant Kayla Williams. . .tells what it's like to be a female soldier in Iraq." --Booklist

    ". . .echoes military memoirists from Julius Caesar to Ernie Pyle." --Publishers Weekly

    ". . .a shocking, on-the-ground view of one military woman's experience in Iraq." --Bookmarks Magazine

    Buy Love My Rifle More Than You here.

    "How to Break a Terrorist,"
    By Matthew Alexander

    "...a riveting, fast-paced account that reads like a first-rate thriller." --Publisher's Weekly

    " ...an absorbing behind-the-scenes look at the secret intelligence war within a war." --Military.com

    Buy How to Break a Terrorist here.

    Search

    Advanced Search

    RSS Feed Links

    Subscribe to VetVoice in a feed reader!

    Subscribe to VetVoice by Email!

    Diaries and comments at VetVoice do not necessarily represent the views of VoteVets.org. VetVoice will strive to remove any illegal material as soon as it is flagged. Similarly, VetVoice will use its discretion in determining whether to remove exceedingly offensive material. However, between posting and removal, any offensive or illegal material does not reflect the condoning or endorsing of said material by VoteVets.org or VetVoice.
    Similarly, the views expressed on this website are those of the authors alone. Opinions on this website do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Defense or any of its components.
    Menu

    Front Page Writers
    PTSD Resources
    TBI Resources
    IRR Information
    Casualty Reports
    VA Information
    Support the Troops
    Veteran Candidates We Support
    Congressional Committees
    Contact Your Elected Leaders
    Sites We Like

    Paid for VoteVets Political Action Committee. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. VoteVets Action Fund is a 501(c)(4) organization which primarily focuses on nonpartisan education and advocacy on behalf veterans and their families. VoteVets Political Action Committee is a federal political committee which primarily helps elect Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran candidates and educates about veterans and military issues aimed at influencing the outcome of the next election.

    Site Design: Articulated Man

    VoteVets Political Action and Vote Vets Action Fund are separate organizations.

    Powered by: SoapBlox