Green Zone under Attack Again; Three Troops Killed

by: Brandon Friedman

Sun Apr 06, 2008 at 17:57:53 PM EDT


The Green Zone was hit again today, this time to a more deadly effect than what we've seen recently:

Rockets or mortars slammed into the U.S.-protected Green Zone and a military base elsewhere in Baghdad on Sunday, killing three American soldiers and wounding 31, an official said.

The attacks occurred as U.S. and Iraqi forces battled Shiite militants in Sadr City in some of the fiercest fighting since radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr ordered a cease-fire a week ago. At least 16 Iraqi civilians were killed in the fighting, according to hospital officials.

A military official said two U.S. troops died and 17 were wounded in the attack on the Green Zone, which houses the U.S. Embassy and the Iraqi government headquarters in central Baghdad.

Another American service member was killed and 14 were wounded in the attack on a base in the southeastern Baghdad area of Rustamiyah, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to release the information.

The U.S. military said separately that an American soldier was killed Sunday in a roadside bombing in the volatile Diyala province north of Baghdad.

Brandon Friedman :: Green Zone under Attack Again; Three Troops Killed
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Just to clarify (0.00 / 0)
31 US soldiers were wounded?  

"No U.S. soldier ever dies in vain because they're carrying out the missions of their commander in chief. And we honor all the service that they've provided." - Barack Obama

It's unclear. (0.00 / 0)
I've heard both versions. . .that it was 31 "other people" and that it was actually 31 other troops.  If Nixon's around, maybe he can clarify.

[ Parent ]
It was troops...(n/t) (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Im guessing (0.00 / 0)
that they do not know who did this? It would appear as if it were the militias, but I wouldnt be surprised if it were AQI. In fact, AQI would actually make sense here as the culprit.

uhhh, don't you guys realize . . . (0.00 / 0)
this means we're winning?

Can't wait to hear how Petreaus spins into a "sign of progress"


He and Crocker can try to spin it anyway they like... (0.00 / 0)
...when they report to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee next week. But, you can be sure that they won't be allowed to get away with it...and THAT will be very fun to watch...depending on ones concept of fun, of course!

[ Parent ]
CNN report tonight (4.00 / 1)
Sometimes, incredibly, cable news delivers solid information.  Tonight CNN aired a report by Nic Robertson, who was in Sadr City (or at least the outskirts) with an Army unit.  Their mission was to persuade Iraqi soldiers, who were taking a long lunch break, to move up and engage some Mahdi Army fighters near a mosque.

Robertson delivered this jaw-dropping revelation: 80 percent of Sadr City has been ruled off-limits to US forces exception with permission of the Iraqi government, which is rarely given.  He said that it is, in effect, a militia safe haven.

Meanwhile, 107 mm rockets and mortar shells are landing in the Green Zone and there isn't much anyone can do to stop it.  Robertson actually described it as the "allegedly secure Green Zone."


Sadr city... (0.00 / 0)
...has been pretty much off limits for US forces for awhile.  It's about time ground forces have been allowed to move on this district, which has been a safe haven for militia thugs for too long.  That's my opinion.  Of course I may be a little biased since I'm at the receiving end of some of these rocket attacks.  Makes the "Support the Troops" take on a whole new meaning for me, haha.

[ Parent ]
To add to this. (0.00 / 0)

Found this buried in a story about Sadr.

The U.S. military, meanwhile, said two more soldiers died in roadside bombings Sunday, raising the day's American death toll to at least five. The announcement comes a day before the two top U.S. officials in Iraq are scheduled to brief Congress on prospects for the eventual withdrawal of American troops.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/200...


VetVoice on Facebook
VetVoice Recommends

"The War I Always Wanted,"
By Brandon Friedman

"The welcome mat for memoirs by veterans of operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom might never wear out so long as they write with the savvy of Brandon Friedman . . . Friedman's take is vivid, frank, precise and dramatic." --Military Times

"Add Brandon Friedman's The War I Always Wanted to the ranks of outstanding non-fiction produced by officers from elite combat units in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Always truthful, often excruciatingly so, The War I Always Wanted rises at numerous points to the level of literature." --Steven Pressfield, author of Gates of Fire

Buy The War I Always Wanted here.

"A Time To Lead,"
By General (Ret.) Wesley K. Clark

"A Time To Lead confirms the rewarding benefits of military service at a time when such service is experiencing considerable strain. It also includes a comprehensive description of America's current national imperatives, which deserve serious consideration." --General Alexander M. Haig, Jr., former Secretary of State

"This is a primer on leadership forged in battle and by decades of experience. . .This isn't just a book; it's a manual for leading people and living a good life." --Barry McCaffrey, General, USA (ret.)

Buy A Time to Lead here.

"Love My Rifle More Than You,"
By Kayla Williams

"Whip smart, sassy, with a mouth as foul as a sailor's, 28-year-old Sergeant Kayla Williams. . .tells what it's like to be a female soldier in Iraq." --Booklist

". . .echoes military memoirists from Julius Caesar to Ernie Pyle." --Publishers Weekly

". . .a shocking, on-the-ground view of one military woman's experience in Iraq." --Bookmarks Magazine

Buy Love My Rifle More Than You here.

"How to Break a Terrorist,"
By Matthew Alexander

"...a riveting, fast-paced account that reads like a first-rate thriller." --Publisher's Weekly

" ...an absorbing behind-the-scenes look at the secret intelligence war within a war." --Military.com

Buy How to Break a Terrorist here.

RSS Feed Links

Subscribe to VetVoice in a feed reader!

Subscribe to VetVoice by Email!

Diaries and comments at VetVoice do not necessarily represent the views of VoteVets.org. VetVoice will strive to remove any illegal material as soon as it is flagged. Similarly, VetVoice will use its discretion in determining whether to remove exceedingly offensive material. However, between posting and removal, any offensive or illegal material does not reflect the condoning or endorsing of said material by VoteVets.org or VetVoice.
Similarly, the views expressed on this website are those of the authors alone. Opinions on this website do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Defense or any of its components.
Menu

Front Page Writers
PTSD Resources
TBI Resources
IRR Information
Casualty Reports
VA Information
Support the Troops
Veteran Candidates We Support
Congressional Committees
Contact Your Elected Leaders
Sites We Like
Search

Advanced Search

Paid for VoteVets Political Action Committee. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. VoteVets Action Fund is a 501(c)(4) organization which primarily focuses on nonpartisan education and advocacy on behalf veterans and their families. VoteVets Political Action Committee is a federal political committee which primarily helps elect Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran candidates and educates about veterans and military issues aimed at influencing the outcome of the next election.

Site Design: Articulated Man

VoteVets Political Action and Vote Vets Action Fund are separate organizations.

Powered by: SoapBlox